Until you have developed the LAV to high level of quality and usability. Please make ffdshow preset in setup, and please support ffdshow Maybe it does not seem convincing to You,īut what coerce You remove ffdshow preset from install setup? So I had to return all of the codecs under ffdshow control. I know where is in ffdshow, where is in LAV?!!! Second, I use ffdshow Picture properties Contrast and Brightness, Problem gone when I disable LAV Splitter. If I press Ctrl+Right several times, it does not show video frames and remains frozen. ![]() Than press Ctrl+Right video is freezing on some time. Jump, Ctrl+Right - one of the necessary function for time economy for passing prompts, advertising and turning boring moments works incorrect. I download new K-Lite pack and be bad surprised. Hi, Guys! I've read this topic, may be LAV have clean code but it absolutely useless for now. XP has more problems than 7 in that regard. Some drivers do it badly and it also depends on the version of Windows. In your case your drivers are doing the mixing. Without a mixer users can have problems like low volume when playing 5.1 audio on a stereo speaker system. But that is high on the ToDo list of its developer. SPDIF work good with both in most cases.įfdshow is still the default for audio because LAV does not yet have channel mixing functionality. ffdshow only has DXVA, it does not support CUDA. ![]() But those are usually not used by normal users. LAV is used for almost all video formats.Īdvantage of ffdshow is that is has various processing filters. This is also reflected in the pack's default settings. For pure video decoding, LAV is certainly the best choice. It is not just relevant that FFmpeg is being used, it also matters how it is used. It also support almost all formats that are supported by FFmpeg, while ffdshow only uses a subset of its functionality. Last edited by estevao on Fri 1:56 am edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Post title sounded like ranting before.) Is this only because of the installer options such as downmixing? BTW, if I do not use ffdshow downmixing while using a stereo set for a 5.1 video, do I actually lose audio information or the hardware drivers perform the downmixing? But wouldn't this be true for all formats? Do LAV and ffdshow use the same code from ffmpeg (libavcodec)? I've noted LAV is preffered over ffdshow for video, but the inverse occurs for audio. Considering both LAV and ffdshow are ffmpeg-based, my question is: why exactly, in K-Lite's default installation, is LAV considered better than ffdshow for many formats, but not others? Where lies this distinction? I understand LAV is more effective for deinterlacing, DXVA, CUDA and SPDIF. I understand LAV has been conquering much of ffdshow's previous territory as well as of other codecs such as WavPack. ![]() In the interest of accuracy, I'd like to ask some questions of you experts. Also an annex listing each pack's contents. Anyway, I have in the guide a discrete section where I discuss a bit about codec options, where I recommend K-Lite CP with particular attention to LAV and ffdshow. ![]() It's in Brazilian Portuguese and available at. During the last 8 months I've been writing a quite large guide to home video "brewing" which started with VirtualDub and VFW/ACM and ended with MeGUI. Hello, I've been using K-Lite CP for years, it's my favorite.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |